All Sparkles, No Heart … a last, dying gasp

I can’t believe we’re already three weeks out from All Sparkles, No Heart.  I don’t get to see any of our cast members on a twice-weekly basis, I don’t have to worry about gold lamé fitting anyone.  It was a big glittery fiction, and now it’s gone.

I planned to have a blog entry up during the show to ask for audience feedback, reactions, anything. I obviously failed, but your thoughts are still welcome (you might say we crave them).  What images stayed with you? What questions did you have? What associations did you make? This is why God made comments sections on the internet!

Photo by Matthew Xavier

In other news, we’re part of this year’s Choreographers’ Evening at the Walker Art Center! Wheee! It’s a snippet we cut out of All Sparkles, not because it wasn’t worthy, but because it refused to be part of a larger work.  Seriously, we couldn’t make it fit. Thankfully, Mr. Schlichting allowed it a chance to see the stage, this November. Come and see!

Mad King Thomas and the All Sparkles!

You may know by now about this thing we’re doing, this epic undertaking that makes me cranky when I’m not working on it and happy when I am.  We might have mentioned it.  It’s happening in a little less than two weeks (oh shit oh shit oh shit oh shit oh shit).

Since we’re too busy making it to blog about it these days, check out the Walker blogs for some stuff from us and our great Momentum colleagues. Or pick up the Walker magazine–the one with Prince on the cover, be still my heart–and check out our interview there.

p.s. I am SO EXCITED to have our picture on the Walker homepage:

Look, ma, I can read!

So, yeah, we spend a lot of time on YouTube, watching DirecTV commercials or clips of Metropolis or Shirley Temple singing the Good Ship Lollypop, or any number of other cultural detritus…it might be fair to call Crazy Tom a detritivore.

But sometimes, we read books. Here’s a little Guy Debord:

49

The spectacle is the other side of money: it is the general abstract equivalent of all commodities. Money dominated society as the representation of general equivalence, namely, of the exchangeability of different goods whose uses could not be compared. The spectacle is the developed modern complement of money where the totality of the commodity world appears as a whole, as a general equivalence for what the entire society can be and can do. The spectacle is the money which one only looks at, because in the spectacle the totality of use is already exchanged for the totality of asbstract representation. The spectacle is not only the servant of pseudo-use, it is already in itself the psuedo-use of life.

I don’t really get it, but I sort of do. The book is like a scent–I catch it sometimes but sometimes just feel like I’ve lost the trail.  Spectacle as the general equivalence of what the entire society can be and can do.  Money which one only looks at.  Putting on a stage show means making a big thing to look at.  How can we pull it out of only looking/listening/consuming?  Or do we even want to do that?

I got nothin’, not right now.

Aesthetic Objects

Hey! Look! It’s a Mad King Thomas dance you almost certainly have never ever seen before, called The eyebrow, or some expression of doubt or daring on their faces:

That’s Liz Schoenborn & Stephanie Stoumbelis. They’re so great.  They jumped in to our totally confusing and aimless process with nothing less than complete enthusiasm and they performed the hell out of the dance we made with them.

(The most productive rehearsal for this piece involved five serious hangovers, a little bit of makeup from the night before and a bucket of Halloween candy.  It generated the phrase “industrial glitter,” which is one of the most useful and perfect phrases of all time. I also hit my head really hard that day while acting like the NFL robot.)

People sometimes say only Mad King Thomas can perform Mad King Thomas work, which is untrue (although I feel flattered when I hear it). 

The difference, as far as I can figure, is that when we make a dance on ourselves, it’s a really extended form of dramaturgy (as if I even know what that word means).  We talk a lot until we find the bones of the thing, then we let performance tell us how the flesh hangs.  We sometimes finish pieces earlier, which means we get to practice them, which occasionally leads to crazy things like polishing the work.  But the basic arc is a lot of back end research, discussion and argument, with a relatively miniscule amount of work on the front end (what it actually looks like to the audienc). Mad King Thomas bravely dances on with only half a clue what’s happening elsewhere on the stage, but fully aware of why it’s happening.

When we make work on other people, we suddenly get to WATCH it.  It’s totally different and usually we get drunk with power. (Do it this way. Okay, do it backwards. Okay, do it faster. No, really faster. Okay, say it with a British accent. Now cry.)  The piece gets more codified and rigid.

At this point the dance has become, more or less, an aesthetic object. Something we can look at and turn into something we find aesthetically (rather than performatively or emotionally) satisfying.  A thing rather than a lived experience.

When we make work on ourselves, we don’t know what the “right way” is to do the dance.  We’re out there singing and dancing with only our internal sense of the appropriate to guide us.  No one says, “Not like that, like this.” 

When we make work on other people, we constantly say, “Not like that, like this.”  So our dancers DO have a sense of right vs. wrong.  (Yuck.)  That’s where we go astray.  We reenact power structures and exert controls that completely undermine the basic promise of our work:

You already know how to do everything you need to do.  Everything you have ever done has prepared you for this moment. You are ready.  

All Sparkles, No Heart hasa big cast.  Only three of them are Mad King Thomas, so I guess it’s time we figure this out.  Luckily for us, everything they have ever done has prepared them for this moment.  We just need to get out of the way.

All Sparkles, No Heart

Date:  July 21, 7:30 pm, July 22, 8:00 pm, July 23, 8:00 pm
Place:  Southern Theater
Address:  1420 Washington Avenue South, Minneapolis
Price:  $18-20 ($16-18 Walker and Southern members)

Tickets available here. Buy ’em now!

Who: Tara King, Theresa Madaus & Monica Thomas, along with the skills and charms of: Ashley Akpaka, Heather Arntson, Emma Barber, Jessica Briggs, Charles Campbell, Sarah Jabar, Tom LloydNick LeMere, Renee Lepreau, Megan MayerCrystal MeisingerSusan Scalf, Liz Schoenborn, and Stephanie Stoumbelis

There will be sparkles.  We’re doing a lot of reading and worrying.  Please come see it! Mad King Thomas and Momentum! TOGETHER AT LAST

Momentum 2011: In Their Own Words

30 Days of Biking

Do you know 30daysofbiking? It’s a bunch of people trying to ride their bikes every day for the month of April.  It starts tomorrow! Because April starts tomorrow!

A big part of rehearsal last night was dedicated to figuring out where and how bikes fit into our show, because maybe not everyone in the universe thinks of the bike as the Great Liberator! But some people do!  Right? When’s the last time you rode a bike? How was it? Seriously, I’m curious.

A new nation, conceived in liberty (and women)

Since we didn’t bring our A-game to the 9×22 talkback last night (might have had something to do with glue, cold pavement, and adrenaline), I figured I’d throw out a bunch of facts about the piece.

Laurie asked for a list of our influences before the show. Here’s that:

People we know, Wheel of Fortune, our bicycles, radical women, Christianity, Gypsy Rose Lee, Pauline Kael, Graham Greene, veneration of flesh, the human creation of gods and celebrities, this quote about famous people “once they’re in our hands, we decide just how famous, and for how long,” suffragettes, bicycles, Vegas, Guy DuBord, the human spirit.

These texts also influenced the piece:

We watched Gypsy Rose Lee (a lot).

Our pieces, for all that they are based on what we read and watch and see, are moving into a realm of feeling, using the stage to create things we want to see exist in the world. I don’t know what it means to say that; almost nothing in the show is something I want to exist outside of the stage (Creepy high school teacher? Tuberculosis-ridden strippers?)

We talked a lot about “the picture of free untrammeled womanhood”: how do each of the images read in the context of freedom and liberation? How does pursuing desire support or distract from the work of liberation? Does glittery gold fabric titillate or empower? In a culture that encourages and denies desire, what does it mean to pursue any desire at all?

Being part of Mad King Thomas means I get to construct realities, can obscure myself with Vanna White, can talk about what I like, do what I like. And sometimes other people want in on the conversation. For which I say thank you a million times.

Here’s our piece, Fish on Bikes: A Picture of Free Untrammeled Womanhood:

AUDITIONS WHOOOOOA

Mad King Thomas is seeking dancers for their upcoming Momentum show in July of 2011!

WHEN: Sunday, April 3
WHAT TIME: 5-7pm
WHERE: Zenon’s studio 4B in the Hennepin Center for the Performing Arts
, 528 Hennepin Ave. Mpls, MN.

What’s that you say, you’ve always dreamed of wearing gold lame’ and high kicking your way across the Southern stage? Well then THIS is the audition for you!

We are looking for 9-20 dancers and performers. Practitioners of all dance styles are welcome, and people of all genders are encouraged to attend. You don’t need to come with a prepared monologue or headshot or any of that fancy stuff. Just wear clothes you can move in (sparkly costume elements always acceptable.)

Must be willing to commit to rehearsals (still to be set) and performance dates July 21-23 as well as tech times (yet to be set) the week of July 18. Rehearsals are unpaid; dancers will receive a small stipend for performance.

Spread the word! PLEASE! Feel free to forward this e-mail OR share our FACEBOOK EVENT. E-mail us with any questions.